Two American Muslims, of similar religious persuasions, disagree on how Muslims should approach Israel:
Abu Sinan: "I disagree with Umar that this group [American Muslims for Understanding Israel or AMI] should target Muslim Israel relations. Israel, as a governmental entity, is a political issue. By even including the name Israel in the title of the group denotes a certain level of acceptance for what is a political subject. If the name of the group were "American Muslims Understanding Jews and Judaism" or even "American Muslims Against Anti-Semitism" I could stand behind it 100%. At the base of 99% of these conspiracy issues is a misunderstanding of Jews, Judaism and the West. Throwing the politically contentious issue of Israel into the fray will do nothing more than muddy the waters and distract from the real issue, which I believe is the issue of anti-Semitism in the Muslim community."
Umar Lee: "The concept of including the name “Israel” troubles Abu Sinan; but I have included it for a reason. I believe Muslims need to accept the fact of the existence of Israel and then move on with it. Israel is not going anywhere and the sooner Muslims reconcile ourselves to that fact then the sooner we can come towards a real solution to the problems and suffering of the Palestinians and the rest of those suffering in the Arab World."
Akhi Umar,
As you can clearly see now by the current events the Myth that Israel is content with just existing peacfully with it's neighbors is just that a Myth. The soon the Muslims reconcile ourselves to the fact that the Zionists must be confronted the sooner we can acheive a sustained peace. La Hawla Wa La Quwwata Illah billah, I never thought I would see the day where knowledgable Muslims adopt such a defeatist attitude. It looks like they ideological onslaught is already taking casualties.
Posted by: Rasheed Moore | August 04, 2006 at 08:11 AM
assalamu alaykum Rasheed
Just so we're clear, I am not Umar :-)
Posted by: thabet | August 04, 2006 at 11:51 AM
Your post triggered flashbacks of my Islamic school experience, when my history teacher defaced the world map in the classroom by crossing out the name 'Israel' and replacing it with Palestine. She then proceeded to give us a very stern lecture about the grievances of the Palestinians and warned us that we must never mention the word 'Israel' again.
Posted by: Safiyyah | August 05, 2006 at 04:16 AM
One of the main problems with Umar's analysis is that he thinks that it is somehow up to the Muslim global audience to sort out the Palestinian situation. There's 4million Palestinians there that want to go home. It's up to them when it's over.
Posted by: Osama Saeed | August 07, 2006 at 12:55 AM
Indeed, it is important that Israel be included in discussions of of religion and politics among Muslims.
But consider this, is there a distinction between the religion of the people and the politics of the people? I think to make such distinctions is an error. As both are directly related to the heart of Islam which is the welfare of the people.
In addition, it is important for Muslims to understand the complex origins of the Jewish-State and the events leading to it. For example, the Zionist movement established in 1897 30+ years prior to the Faisal-Weizmann Agreement; the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Arab Revolt... which resulted in two faced trickery by imperialist Britons, etc.
Consequently, it may be true that Israel isn't going anywhere however, like every nation-state, sovereignty or empire... their future is subject to change, inshaallah.
wasalaam.
I have a different opinion from Brothers Abu Sinan and Umar Lee, both make good points, however I would like to add that...Posted by: Abu Sahajj | August 07, 2006 at 03:44 PM