Last week, Dervish noted a speech by an Australian government official who demanded Muslims who move to Australia 'respect Australian law and give up the shari'ah'. More recently, in Britain, Trevor Phillips, the chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) demanded that Muslims who want 'Islamic shari'ah law' should 'leave Britain'.
The problem with both calls is they're largely misinformed. Shari'ah exists where ever Muslims happen to exist. So if a Muslim decides not to eat a bacon sandwich, to avoid alcohol, to visit the mosque on a Friday, to perform the qui-daily pray, to pay zakat, to ritually wash herself, and the Muslim does all this living in London, New York or Sydney, then shari'ah is in existence and being observed.
It should be realised that the shari'ah is not a single text that is opened and from which one reads an answer to a particular situation. To talk of "shari'ah law" is really to talk of the cumulative interpretation of a whole range of texts and customs, foremost of which are the Qur'an and hadith material. [1] It can be seen as a combination of practice, theory, belief and custom. A social history of Muslims could be written using these interpretations as the shari'ah has developed depending on the situations (cultural/geographical/social) in which Muslims have found, and continue to find, themselves. It does violence to the concept of shari'ah to reduce it simply to a set of 'laws' to be enforced by the state, which is what is assumed by far too many people, including Muslims. When Western Muslims talk about shari'ah they are not likely to be referring to the functions of the state or seditious activites which undermine the state or society at large; but about individual matters of conscience, piety and observance of religious duties. If anything, authoritative shari'ah interpretations require Muslims to obey the local laws in their place of residence, unless they feel the laws force them to contradict their beliefs, in which case it is widely held opinion that the Muslim should try to leave for another place. Of course, this doesn't mean state laws are not based upon shari'ah. [2]
The point of dispute (if one is to recognise the dispute) between 'reformists', 'traditionalists', 'modernists' and 'progressives' (and so on) is to how to interpret the shari'ah, not merely that something called shari'ah exists; it always exists as it is a fundamental concept of Islam.
Update (01/03): I am reminded that the Telegraph also comissioned a poll which asked Muslims their views on shari'ah. The Grauniad also did the same in 2004.
Notes
[1] Scholarly consensus and local custom can also be taken a source of shari'ah. Another perspective would argue that the shari'ah is only the core sources of Islam, the Qur'an and sunna, and everything else on top of that is reduced to human interpretation. Literally, the word means 'the way to the watering hole'.
[2] The word qanun is sometimes used to refer to state (positive) law.



Blog feed








Nice article, good to see you posting regularly again.
Posted by: snooo | March 02, 2006 at 09:30 AM
As long as you don't try to impose it on me.
Posted by: Sissy Willis | March 07, 2006 at 01:57 PM
There have always been people in the west who have tried to force their customs on Muslims. I heard a great lecture entitle the crusades and the false kingdom of jerusalem that talks about the same thing. You can get the audio CD at www.islamiclearningmaterials.com.
Also, if anyone wants to know more about the basic teachings of Islam, I'm giving away a free disk until April 7, 2006. Just contact me at abuibollc@yahoo.com for more info.
Posted by: Abu Ibo | March 09, 2006 at 05:27 PM
You're far too self-important, SW.
Posted by: thabet | March 09, 2006 at 11:25 PM
there have also always been Muslims who have tried to force their beliefs on other muslims. This is why Shia's relieve tragedy on Ashura.
A secular authority is best for both Muslims and nonMuslims, in my opinion.
Posted by: Steve | March 10, 2006 at 01:30 AM
The good thing about your information is that it is explicit enough for students to grasp. Thanks for your efforts in spreading academic knowledge.
Posted by: Custom Essays | January 29, 2009 at 06:13 AM
good blog
Posted by: danial | July 06, 2009 at 01:12 PM
WOW, this'll keep me busy for years. I've been subscribing to your RSS feed for months, but somehow I missed this great list.
Posted by: custom essays | August 01, 2009 at 12:11 PM
nice blog
Posted by: custom papers | August 26, 2009 at 08:45 AM